The decision of migrar to have to be considered as an alternative that if presents the citizen, and not as an alternative lack. Thus, it imposes it necessity of intervention in logic of that actors and agents, on the part of State (also in its proper logic) so that those modifications if give in the direction of standards of occupation, use and territorial interaction that are, truily, daily pay-conditions for a process of harmonious development and supporting, with respect to the ambient vulnerabilities and restrictions and the diversities partner-cultural prevalecentes in the diverse parts (regions) that they integrate the set of the territory of a nation. Thus, since a democratic perspective, of respect to the rights of the citizens, the National Congress occupies a decisive paper (and positive) as ‘ ‘ fidiciary office of balana’ ‘ , for where the measures that impactam, directly or indirectly, the territory, necessarily, must pass. the Political party can and must act, in accordance with its respective Principles, in the direction of if proactively locating in the debates and relative questions to the territorial subjects. the presence of a sector of territorial militancy in the Political parties will have a strategical mission to play in the seio of each Party, bringing for the scope of this the tensions and yearnings of the society how much to the impacts on the territory, decurrent of the actions of the social actors and the economic agents. E, at the same time, to lead for the society what the representatives of the Party, fulfilling popular mandates Legislative in them and occupying positions executive in them, in the three levels of Government, potentially, they can make to intervine in the course of the events. to carry through the synthesis between what the society inhales and what each Political party will be able to carry through, will be the basic mission of a partisan territorial militancy.