It all began on April 2, when Zapatero announced before the Socialist Federal Committee that he would not submit to re-election. This dndio the process of primaries of the party, while others, such as Felipe Gonzalez were in favour of choosing a candidate directly. Carme Chacon was not presented to the first because he was at risk the unity of the party. Zapatero proposed to Rubalcaba, and it picked up the glove accepting submitted to the primaries. Rubalcaba has been proclaimed candidate for general elections by the PSOE this Saturday. Barely three months after the President of the Government, Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, announced before the PSOE would not repeat as candidate for the general elections, the party has closed this Saturday his succession with Alfredo Perez Rubalcaba, after some primary without opponent.
Rubalcaba has placed the party in the beginning of the run-up, though remains the doubt whether the elections will be held next fall or in 2012. These are the main events since Zapatero said that not he opted to run for reelection: April 2, 2011. Zapatero Announces in the Federal Committee of the PSOE, the highest body between congresses, which would not be candidate in the general understanding that it is more convenient to the party, the country and his family. It confirms its intention of straining the legislature and which also announces against the handpick mechanism, his successor as head of the list in 2012 will be chosen in primaries after the municipal and regional elections on May 22. on April 3.
Pre-campaign Sunday. Zapatero receives heat of Socialists supporters at a rally in Murcia while, in two separate acts politicians, the first Vice-President, Alfredo Perez Rubalcaba, and Dnsa, Carme Chacon, Minister are acclaimed and received President shouting. on April 5. The Deputy Secretary general of the PSOE, Jose Blanco, promises that it will be completely neutral but not indifferent before the primaries of the PSOE, which shall be convened by the Federal Committee on 28 May.
In May 2005, by e-mail received a message that my e-mail address, among hundreds of others were drawn in the lottery, fell lucky numbers (numbers indicated) to win the award (given), for further information contact the coordinator (e-mail address set). Y Coordinator has received confirmation of congratulations and some clarifications. The winning amount under the terms of the game is not divisible and must be sent to the winner of the whole. The amount is kept at a general impersonal account for all the winners. After filling out the questionnaire (on company letterhead with the address of the International Lottery Company and phones in Amsterdam, Netherlands) with my name, name, bank account number, which I would like to receive money required to pay $ 650 Eur through Western Union for processing (separation) of the sum of my winnings on my name to this general impersonal sum of all the winners.
Because I do not have a bank account in the Netherlands, said that the need to open escrow account is not a resident, identified the deposit amount and bank details. Because entitled to the funds we can not send a whole, we sent in installments through Western Union. It took a couple of months. Further, since I am not a resident of the Netherlands, said that we should not pay the resident tax (Non-Resident Tax). Paid in installments over several months. After that requiring payment of the cost of translation (Cost of transfer) the winning amount. All this rigmarole is still ongoing, since Money such was not what they required for all these charges.
Others of them establishes that you aid to qualified academics to subsidize training stays, practical, collaboration or specialization which involve tasks by way of provision of services shall establish in any case the Social security contribution as training contracts, although not obliged to labour recruitment. On the other hand, the Government undertakes to prove in a year the regulatory development of regulation of reverse mortgages and dependency insurance and which establishes certain standard tax, pending since the reform of the mortgage Act of 2007. Other amendments, confirm what has been agreed last week between PSOE and CiU during the presentation. Consistency of CIU El CiU Deputy Carles Campuzano has remarked the coherence of his group since 1995 to the challenges posed by the pension reform, which have always come up with agreement of the social partners, as it has been the case. Out of respect for the decision taken at the end of January by CEOE, CC OO and UGT, will maintain this position, has had an impact. Campuzano has had an impact on its support to the delay in retirement age for demographic reasons and has ensured that this does not It affects the public nature of pensions in any case.
In addition, has dndido that its amendments elevate the fairness and justice of the system, compensate for historical claims of the autonomous communities, improve the transparency of the system and support demands of the professional released and freelancers. System shall enter into deficit the PP spokesman, Tomas Burgos, has assured that the Government draws ahead unilaterally and thanks to the flea market with Catalan nationalists a project that low pensions to citizens, and has remarked that the PP was proposing an alternative not to cut, but to ensure the sustainability of the system. We did not want a reform of headlines but not inaccurate, it has had an impact. In this sense, he recalled his bet by voluntary retirement delayed properly encouraged and enshrine as law the automatic revaluation of pensions, to avoid another freezing as the 2011. Our amendments have not been taken into consideration, has remarked, predicting that its first cto will be immediate entry into deficit in the system.Harakiri before the 15-M by IU, Gaspar Llamazares, has assured that Congress makes harakiri by passing this historic kick performed in the service of the markets instead of citizens, which has been ignored in the decision to delay of you retirement age, which explains the 15-M movement protests What has called on the groups to sean insumisa and stop processing. Then, you to the share, which carry it in their manifesto for the forthcoming general elections. The spokesperson for the BNG, Olaia Fernandez Davila, has described unfortunate extension of the retirement age and the period of computation of pension, which will mean a loss of the public pension of up to 10%. His view, the measure is clearly in favour of investment in private funds, within an attack voracious unleashed by the markets against the welfare state. Source of the news: El PSOE brings forward in Congress the reform of pensions with the support of CiU
The thing is very difficult in these elections. If we were to take into account and give credibility to the latest surveys, we would have a good electoral gloomy. In the end having to choose between Keiko and Humala. While the candidate for Fuerza 2011 tells us that his Government will not be authoritarian, it is very difficult to believe him, after giving to understand the debate, that the Government of his father was the best of recent times. Keiko wants us to believe at all costs, she fought to remove Vladimiro’s Government, when this was first lady, to realize his dark dealings. While it is true that terrorism had to defeat the bad (there was no other option) Keiko, has said that it restore order and tough security. It will be like the Government of his father.
To the bad and committing excesses? He also said that his intention was not to dissolve Congress as his father did on 5 April 1992, because they were other times and political circumstances. And that is unrepeatable. Mario Vargas Llosa has declared for the chain television CNN, that the vote for Toledo, since you don’t want to have to choose between cancer and AIDS referring to Keiko and Humala. It is a clear message to the population of someone who has the power of manipulation on public opinion, since he may have chosen to either of the remaining two: PPK or Castaneda. Because but they would be what kind of disease? Healthy would have been to say he would vote for anyone, less by those two (Keiko or Humala) Toledo wants to be present as the Savior of the country, wants to meet with the democratic forces in the country vote for him. We’re not in the runoff cholito. Hold your cart. Of course if you go to the second round with Humala, the country’s democratic force will be with you, but don’t you presiputes.
There are two other democratic options that also have the right to go to a second round. You must be calm and tranquility. Let us hope that the country knows to choose. I think, in a fateful end, and that there would not be another option of choice for the second round, having to choose as says Mario, among AIDS or cancer. In particular, it would have to vote for the Japanese candidate. And expect God to enlighten it so follow the route marked in the country’s economy. It could be, since she is not linked with authoritarianism of Chavez and company. I’m not Fujimori, I’m going to vote for Castaneda, but given the case, that we have left.