Italian Executive
In the week where plus a chapter of the crisis that if uncurls in U.S.A. and the Zone of the Euro it comes to tona, with the degradation of the note of credit of the Italian debt of ' ' A+' ' for ' ' A' ' , more uncertainty hangs on the perspectives of recovery of the world-wide economy. The meeting enters the main world-wide leaders in the General meeting of the ONU and the conversations parallel bars on subjects related to the evolution of the crises American and European do not only serve of alento for the increasing uncertainties with regard to the solution of Greece or Ireland, but also with regard to the other members of the PIIGS, over all Italy. The announcement of the package of stabilization of the Italian economy caused innumerable protests and not only launched for land the popularity of the first-minister Berlusconi, but also if it did not show capable to balance the national accounts, as much in the short one, how much in the long stated period. This because, at the moment where United States and the Zone of the Euro try decreases taxes of creximento or until shrinking of the real product, in special of the industrial product, the solutions pointed for the majority of policy makers goes to the meeting of the economic ortodoxia, when, in the truth, economic history teaches the opposite exactly. The recent package of measures of fiscal austerity approved by the Italian Executive is the case most recent. The Italian deficit that was of 4.6% in 2010 must, according to government, being reduced for 1.6% in 2012, generating a economy for the public coffers in the value of 20 billion in the year that it comes and 25 billion in 2013. This will be executed through the increase of taxes for the band of raised income more of the population, cut in the available budget for the congressmen, reduction of the administrative machine, saw reduction in the number of provinces, privatization of municipal companies, flexibilizao of the working laws (what theoretically it would facilitate the act of contract) and reduction in the social expenditures.
The historical counterpart derevelao capable to collate and until demoralizing the silence of the agencies and arisada of the skeptics still leaves a bigger sensation of abandonment of the prpria Humanity luck, therefore the only fact concrete that it brought salvation of this caosilusrio of the world could not nor can give to any test of its concretude, demanding only the faith and the confidence in the certification of that, direct ouindiretamente, they had stopped contact with the object of the revelation. The high level mais. If the proper God (here in assumption) judged the Humanity infuriates to dereceber a test of Its existence and ticket for the Land, why haveramosde to think about a concrete ufolgica test delivers of kissed hand the quemno deserved at least a test of God? Soon, not would be nothing surprising osilncio generalized in any search for evidence scientific of taismistrios, what it dangerously approaches in them to the hypothesis of that the proper God (in assumption) would be, so to speak, ‘ ‘ joint phenomenon UFO’ ‘ , demoralizing it due to tests! It is the dapicada end, and of a bite without antidote. We were to bisbilhotar in what we did not fit, and therefore we lose the right to know. In addition, we were hurled numplanetide where we can be ludibriados the life all, without never will quehaver proving it after the life. Inexistent if the such agencies to exist? For queelas they deserve to know what we were denied? Would be consisting agencies deanjos and therefore they had not destroyed the churches? It pulls! It only aches to think Restainclume the faith mortal we. It seems a sad conclusion, but it is not.
But, segundoele, Bobbio ‘ ‘ also entresi emphasized the interdependence of the three ideals, in the direction that also dosoutros the coherent search of each one of them compels to the search, and that the proper definition of each one of them requires the use of the noescorrespondentes to the others two: ‘ Human rights, democracy and peace are trsmomentos necessary the same the historical movement: without humanosreconhecidos and protected rights it does not have democracy; without democracy it does not have condiesmnimas for the pacific solution of the conflicts. In other words, democracia the society of the citizens, and the subjects if become citizens when of them passama to be recognized some basic rights; it will have steady peace, a peace queno has the war as alternative, when more it will not only have apenascidados of this or that State, but of mundo’ ‘ ‘. The main right is the right to the humanity. Quepara happens to make to be valid the human rights needs to hug of comorespeito heart ideas to the creed, color, race, sort diversity, of classroom, denacionalidade.
In this direction the activity politics leaves exclusively of being space of the State, to start to be classroom fight. For Marx, ‘ ‘ poltica’ ‘ sample that this was developed by the men throughout history for example, the situation that occurred in the State of the Bahia in 2001, that it was portraies for the set of documents ' ' Choque' ' , recorded exactly in the heat of the events, where the military policy, institution of repression of the State, invaded the university campus of the School of Right of the Federal University of the Bahia, that they protested against the corruption and mandonismo politician of the government of the State and asked for to the disability of the senator Antonio Carlos Magalhes accused with fraud in the electronic panel it federal Senate. At these moments that we must in them question on the power and the legitimacy of the power of the State, said democratic, but that on behalf of the order, if it imposes with the use of the force of its repressive device. Situation as it is in them remembers the years of the military dictatorship in Brazil, that we lived in State of extremely authoritarian, repressive, did not admit the popular opposition, but it is situation in the Bahia in 2001, passed 16 of the end of the dictatorship, provokes in them to think if we live in a democratic State in fact, where the freedom of ‘ ‘ The specific purpose of the institucional politics, of the prism of the State, is the imposition of a economic structure to sociedade’ ‘ society. But only some citizens are of represented facts, the State take care of the interests of these, its classroom. The author also a difference society politics and civil society. The society politics says respect to the public administration, to be able judiciary, the Armed Forces, already the civil society is where they are the parties, schools, companies, the social and popular unions, movements.
Extraordinary! To wake up, one more time, with the notice of plus a victim in the exit of the Shopping makes me to Manara to believe that this spectacle renews its personages to each week and, mainly, its way of performance. The ingressions, for the visa, must reach an incredible number of spectators, who attend the scenes with new performances when passing of the days and if they delight in the details covered of desumanidade. You, who are reading this article, can be the next one. for my surprise? It will continue not to fight for its right to go and to come, assured for the Federal Constitution. Being thus, a cautious and private citizen ahead of that it is cabvel.