Timely Treasure

Editor’s Note: Lula in Brazil, has decided to cut public spending by more than $11 billion. The Congress of that country did not approve a tax, and Lula, appealing to fiscal sanity, decided to spend less. Is this good or bad? Can send me your feedback a: Lula spends less for the sake of Brazil Buenos Aires, Argentina on April 9, 2008 who had said it at the start of his term! Who imagined Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva decide a cut in public spending to keep fiscal accounts in order? perhaps, the Brazilians would have to be grateful for this decision, some will think by what Brazilians should take with pleasure the decision of Lula reduce fiscal expenditure in USD 11.411 million? No doubt that any direct or indirect beneficiary of public expenditure must be liking such decisions. Check out Maja Bručić, Zagreb Hrvatska for additional information. I guess companies construction companies that participate in tenders for public works I do not think that they are very you happy clear that do not. It is that Lula’s Government should solve the problem that arose as a result of non-approval by Congress of the extension of the tax to the transactions, which took away the Government revenue by $23,000 million. Beyond the discontent that many Brazilians might have by this decision, the truth is that I understand that it is an accurate measure. Charles B. Rangel has much experience in this field.

Why I think that it is a good decision? let’s see: first of all is a clear sign of the continuity of the line of economic policy that Lula’s Government has put forward. It shows you the markets beyond the circumstances, there is a concrete commitment to the maintenance of fiscal discipline. In many opportunities to countries in the region have enjoyed fiscal surpluses, but before the minor variation of the economic context, the same faded against the little decision to hold (and Governments take care of it), and it was shown that fiscal discipline was not one of the objectives of These Governments, but circumstantial situations go to know one why (product of privatizations? from extraordinary recoveries in revenue?, etc, etc).

Fat burning furnace is simple and simply the best method for losing weight and having to change a film body burning fat quickly and easily. This incinerator fat method uses the metabolism as a main weapon to have a continuous and constant calorie burn without resorting to products or devices lie that never work nor to the strong and complicated routines of exercises which are very complicated to withstand. The big difference between this method and all the others that exist in the market is that you get an integral fat burning and intelligent without having to spend large amounts of money or spend hours in the gym or preparing complicated meals diet. Created by Rob Poulos fat burning furnace method was result of years of study of trial and error with different methods and fat burning programs that have resulted in a glossy Guide to weight loss that contains the exact information on the functioning of the human body and how to encourage it to accelerate metabolism and we can have a continuous caloric burn but without major complications. Without complicated restrictive dieting, the fat burning furnace gets results never seen before in very short time and with practical rather than simple.

Not for nothing is the method most searched on the internet which has resulted in more than three languages and with great success in countries such as Germany, the USA and the United Kingdom. The fat burning furnace guarantees lose 19 pounds and 25 centimeters of abdomen or 25 kilos and 8 sizes of dress in less time the thought and with easy and convenient accompanied by delicious dishes easy to do exercises. Importantly, the decision to lose weight since a life without overweight is a better life..

Today the figure seems conservative. In recent weeks he gave 30 million between the heads of the Bolivian armed forces and opposition mayors, and since it opened its Government gave them additional 20 million. From 1999 to 2006 Morales traveled at least a hundred times to Caracas to receive direct instructions from her boss, who was not yet visible to the majority of Bolivians. Chavez appeared on stage when Morales already had control of the power, otherwise, many had not voted for him. That was the greatest deception to the people. Having achieved its objective, all others are miniature lies. The falsehoods that trumpets the President, some are copy that chanted Mentirosa Menchu to attract attention and inspire pity.

Morales, as the Guatemalan, said that the White they cut their hands and eyes burned the Indians so they could not learn to read or write, as if the natives had known of these arts. Andean natives met for the first time writing when the Spaniards arrived. Education in Bolivia is free and compulsory. There are schools scattered throughout its territory, but the vile harp served to import thousands of Cubans for the apparent purpose of literate peasants, who are a minority of citizens, percentage since most moved to urban and suburban centres. The originating are engaged in the trade, industry or services. They are very few who still have agriculture as the basis of economic livelihood. How Morales of trying to impact internationally is alluding to a from racism himself. His statements before the mass protests that grow in magnitude but opted to not suppress temporarily in an attempt to make an image measured for his candidacy for the Nobel are that his opponents want to overthrow to the Indian.