Conclusion

Conclusion

In this land, the fact is that Scrates condemned politesmo official, the religion of State, that compelled to an incompatible speculative conformismo with the dignity human being and the freedom of conscience. That is, Scrates said that, in the words of Rasp, ' ' the fanatism, democratic or ditatorial, is that he is the enemy of the dignity human being and the freedom of conscincia' '. Being thus, Scrates imprisoned and was condemned by crimes against religious deities and entities of the State, having been judged and having as penalty the death. It waited 1 month until being executed in an arrest. It was not sad with its death, therefore, for it, the soul was immortal e, with the separation of it of the body, would go to find the real truth. In this direction, the death of Scrates is interpreted in some ways and brings diverse meanings.

For Loving Alceu Rasp: In the reality, Scrates did not die for a regimen politician, but for a higher principle of what all regimes? of the dignity the human being. What it did not tolerate was the oppression of the thought, it was of the Multitude, it was of the State, it was on behalf of the Deuses, it was on behalf of the onipotncia of the Reason, the Violence or the Number (Rasp. 1992. P. 12. in Vindication of Scrates). In this manner, we can see that Scrates was a man to the front of its time, of the perspectives of common sense, the laws, the rules, its reality.

Its death, compared with the one of Christ, represents the freedom and not it authority. It was a protest against all the tyrannies. 3. Conclusion We saw, in elapsing of the work, that the philosophy is born truily as a science, in search of explanations for what the nature provided to the man, as well as explanations for its existence, explanations for what it proper age. It evolves of a mythology form Greek for a science in search of the truth. It is ece of fish in practical what she said respect at the time: the square. E, in this manner, follows its proper molds, in what it says respect to the debates and quarrels around the diverse questions that involved the plis Greek. If, before Scrates, had the interest for the explanation of the exterior nature to the man, with it the question if they place in all the scopes of quarrels, as religion and politics. Scrates, in this point, guided for the oracle of Dlfus, if placed in a situation of learning, search of the absolute truth that would have to exist, and considered the real truth as that the beauty, just and the good one. In this direction, Scrates all places in guideline a way of living and questioning it, making with that powerful it entered in conflict with proper it. Thus, its death represented a fight against all the impositions that are faced of natural form, and placed the debate and the question of universal knowing as basic for the life human being.

Comments are closed.